Title: 2018 ACVIM Forum Research Abstract Program: Seattle, Washington, June 14 - 15, 2018 Document date: 2018_10_25
ID: 60ceejq1_509
Snippet: Passing-Bablok regression analysis: intercept 1.0 μg/dL (0.0 to 2.0); slope 1.0 (0.9 to 1.1); Tau 0.84. The Pearson';s correlation coefficient (r) was 0.94. The mean difference (Bland-Altman plot) was 0.0 μg/dL; standard deviation: 5.7 μg/dL (4.9 to 6.4). Limits-of-agreement (LOA) plot showed no fixed or proportional bias, with increased variation at the higher end of the dynamic range where unlikely to impact clinical decisions. LOA upper lim.....
Document: Passing-Bablok regression analysis: intercept 1.0 μg/dL (0.0 to 2.0); slope 1.0 (0.9 to 1.1); Tau 0.84. The Pearson';s correlation coefficient (r) was 0.94. The mean difference (Bland-Altman plot) was 0.0 μg/dL; standard deviation: 5.7 μg/dL (4.9 to 6.4). Limits-of-agreement (LOA) plot showed no fixed or proportional bias, with increased variation at the higher end of the dynamic range where unlikely to impact clinical decisions. LOA upper limit 11.1 μg/dL (9.4 to 13.0). LOA lower limit -11.1 μg/dL (-13.0 to -9.3).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- agreement limit and dynamic range: 1, 2
- agreement limit and mean difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- Bland Altman plot and correlation coefficient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- Bland Altman plot and mean difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- Bland Altman plot mean difference and mean difference: 1
- clinical decision and correlation coefficient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- clinical decision and high end: 1, 2
- clinical decision and mean difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- correlation coefficient and dynamic range: 1, 2, 3
- correlation coefficient and mean difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date