Selected article for: "funnel plot and publication bias"
Author: Chanaka N Kahathuduwa; Chathurika S Dhanasekara; Shao-Hua Chin
Title: Case fatality rate in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Document date: 2020_4_6
    • ID: dcf6bl8f_6
    Snippet: The random effects meta-regression analyses revealed a pooled estimate of 4.8% 188 (95%CI, 2.4%-9.5%) for the prevalence of critical illness in COVID-19 infection (Figure 3a) . 189 Leave-one-out meta-regression analyses did not significantly change this estimate. The funnel 190 plot of effect-sizes (Figure 3b ) was highly suggestive of underreporting or publication bias......
    Document: The random effects meta-regression analyses revealed a pooled estimate of 4.8% 188 (95%CI, 2.4%-9.5%) for the prevalence of critical illness in COVID-19 infection (Figure 3a) . 189 Leave-one-out meta-regression analyses did not significantly change this estimate. The funnel 190 plot of effect-sizes (Figure 3b ) was highly suggestive of underreporting or publication bias.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • critical illness and publication bias: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • critical illness and random effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • critical illness and underreporting publication bias: 1, 2
    • critical illness prevalence and meta regression: 1, 2, 3
    • critical illness prevalence and publication bias: 1, 2, 3
    • critical illness prevalence and random effect: 1, 2
    • critical illness prevalence and underreporting publication bias: 1, 2
    • estimate change and meta regression: 1
    • estimate change and publication bias: 1
    • meta regression analysis and publication bias: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
    • meta regression analysis and random effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • meta regression and publication bias: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • meta regression and random effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • meta regression and underreporting publication bias: 1, 2, 3
    • pool estimate and publication bias: 1
    • publication bias and random effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • publication bias and underreporting publication bias: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • random effect and underreporting publication bias: 1