Selected article for: "BVD cattle and cattle compulsory testing efficacy"
Author: ISODA, Norikazu; ASANO, Akihiro; ICHIJO, Michiru; OHNO, Hiroshi; SATO, Kazuhiko; OKAMOTO, Hirokazu; NAKAO, Shigeru; KATO, Hajime; SAITO, Kazuma; ITO, Naoki; USUI, Akira; TAKAYAMA, Hiroaki; SAKODA, Yoshihiro
Title: Assessment of the cost effectiveness of compulsory testing of introduced animals and bulk tank milk testing for bovine viral diarrhea in Japan
  • Document date: 2019_3_1
    • ID: 3ivoabj1_26
    Snippet: The efficacy of compulsory testing of non-vaccinated cattle at lower BVDV prevalence was evaluated. The median numbers of detected and missed BVD cattle cases decreased with lower BVDV prevalence (Fig. 3) . At a lower BVDV prevalence, the gaps of the median numbers of detected and BVD cattle cases became smaller among the scenarios with different vaccination coverages in outside of the target area, and the same trend was observed in the gaps of t.....
    Document: The efficacy of compulsory testing of non-vaccinated cattle at lower BVDV prevalence was evaluated. The median numbers of detected and missed BVD cattle cases decreased with lower BVDV prevalence (Fig. 3) . At a lower BVDV prevalence, the gaps of the median numbers of detected and BVD cattle cases became smaller among the scenarios with different vaccination coverages in outside of the target area, and the same trend was observed in the gaps of the median numbers of missed BVD cattle cases. Moreover, the median numbers of detected BVD cattle by compulsory testing of all non-vaccinated cattle or non-vaccinated heifers were almost same at 0.025% of BVD prevalence, regardless of vaccination coverage.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • compulsory testing and low BVDV prevalence: 1, 2
    • compulsory testing and median number: 1, 2
    • compulsory testing and non vaccinated cattle: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • compulsory testing and non vaccinated cattle compulsory testing: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • compulsory testing and non vaccinated cattle compulsory testing efficacy: 1
    • compulsory testing and target area: 1, 2, 3
    • compulsory testing and target area outside: 1, 2
    • compulsory testing and vaccination coverage: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • detected BVD cattle and low BVDV prevalence: 1
    • detected BVD cattle and median number: 1, 2, 3
    • detected BVD cattle and non vaccinated cattle: 1
    • detected BVD cattle and vaccination coverage: 1, 2, 3
    • detected BVD cattle median number and median number: 1
    • detected BVD cattle median number and non vaccinated cattle: 1
    • detected BVD cattle median number and vaccination coverage: 1
    • low BVDV prevalence and non vaccinated cattle: 1, 2
    • low BVDV prevalence and non vaccinated cattle compulsory testing: 1, 2
    • low BVDV prevalence and non vaccinated cattle compulsory testing efficacy: 1
    • low BVDV prevalence and target area: 1