Selected article for: "ratio rate and statistically significant difference"

Author: Xiong, Mingzhou; Lan, Lina; Feng, Tiejian; Zhao, Guanglu; Wang, Feng; Hong, Fuchang; Wu, Xiaobing; Zhang, Chunlai; Wen, Lizhang; Liu, Aizhong; Best, John McCulloch; Tang, Weiming
Title: Analysis of the sex ratio of reported gonorrhoea incidence in Shenzhen, China
  • Document date: 2016_3_14
  • ID: 2smn2hl5_24
    Snippet: Among 92 male participants with positive NG results in clinics, five cases were unreported to CISDCP (5.4%, 95% CI 2.2% to 8.6%). One case was unreported among five NG positive female participants (20.0%, 95% CI 0.0% to 44.8%). The gender difference of unreported rate was not statistically significant ( p=0.278). The sex ratio of unreported rate was 1:3.7 (table 3) ......
    Document: Among 92 male participants with positive NG results in clinics, five cases were unreported to CISDCP (5.4%, 95% CI 2.2% to 8.6%). One case was unreported among five NG positive female participants (20.0%, 95% CI 0.0% to 44.8%). The gender difference of unreported rate was not statistically significant ( p=0.278). The sex ratio of unreported rate was 1:3.7 (table 3) .

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • female participant and positive female participant: 1
    • gender difference and NG result: 1
    • gender difference and sex ratio: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • NG result and sex ratio: 1
    • NG result and unreported rate: 1
    • NG result and unreported rate sex ratio: 1
    • sex ratio and unreported rate: 1, 2, 3
    • sex ratio and unreported rate sex ratio: 1, 2